If you can't build, you're becoming irrelevant.
(And this isn't just about Product Managers)
The business-industrial complex sold us a lie: that talking equals progress.
It doesn't. It's economic Darwinism in action.
I've scaled products to millions of DAUs and the pattern is clear as day. Engineers consistently destroy "strategic thinkers" because they see what's possible while MBAs are still obsessing over McKinsey frameworks.
The math is ugly:
- Build working prototype: 3 days
- Schedule alignment meeting: 3 weeks
- Earn respect from your team: Build something that works
This disease spreads beyond product management.
Marketing directors who can't build landing pages. UX designers shipping Figma files like it's 2015. Consultants recommending solutions they couldn't build if their kids' college tuition depended on it.
The harsh truth: Your "strategic thinking" is worthless without execution.
Here's what I tell my students, as well as teams I collaborate with:
Learn Cursor, v0, Lovable, Claude Code. These AI tools let you ship actual working solutions without spending four years getting computer science debt.
Plus, you bypass that passive-aggressive engineer who gatekeeps your ideas because they "don't align with the technical roadmap" (translation: they think your idea sucks and enjoy watching you fail).
The great bifurcation is here: Builders vs. talkers.
The builders are hiring. The talkers are getting fired.
Ideas that used to take months, now take days.
Your move: Build something this week.
Automate a workflow. Ship a micro-tool. Create a working demo.
Because while you're crafting the perfect slide deck, someone else is solving the actual problem.
What have you built lately?